Intergenerational Dialogue

Separated by Age, United by Conversation?

Anmeldung

Die Anmeldung findet über RWTHonline statt und ist bis zum 25.10.2024 möglich. Weitere Informationen zum Anmeldeprozess können dem FAQ entnommen werden.

Alle Studierenden können an einer Lehrveranstaltung teilnehmen. Sie können zwei Präferenzen angeben. Hierfür nutzen Sie bitte die Prioritäten “hoch” und die direkt darunterliegende. Für eine Anleitung klicken Sie bitte hier. Wenn Sie am Ende des Zuordnungsverfahrens keinen Platz erhalten haben und trotzdem an einer Teilnahme in einer Lehrveranstaltung interessiert sind, kontaktieren Sie bitte sibel.yildirim[@]ipw.rwth-aachen.de.

(Wenn Sie Probleme bei der Anmeldung haben, melden Sie sich bitte bei Frau Sibel Yildirim (IPW) unter Angabe Ihrer Matrikelnummer: sibel.yildirim@ipw.rwth-aachen.de. Bei allgemeinen Fragen zur Lehrveranstaltung wenden Sie sich bitte an die unten angegebene Ansprechperson.)

Wir freuen uns über Fragen und Anmerkungen. Hier können Sie Kontakt zu uns aufnehmen! (Projekt “Leonardo” gibt es auch auf Facebook und Instagram)

Academic Responsibility

Oliver Reisen, M. A.

Episcopal Academy Aachen Lecturer for Natural Science and Digitality

Prof. Dr. phil. Stefan Böschen

Holder of the Chair of “Technology and Society” at the Human Technology Center at RWTH Aachen University

Alina Cohnen, M. Ed.

Academic Staff Faculty for Modern History and its Cultures of Knowledge and Technology

Contact Person

Schedule

Start

17.10.2024

Zeit

Thursday, 16:30 to 19:00 pm

Ort

in presence

Bischöfliche Akademie (BAK)
Leonhardstraße 18-20
52064 Aachen
 
Seminarroom Leonardo

Contents

The view of ‘the old’: this generation is the laziest, this generation is the stupidest and this generation doesn’t know what’s important. The view of ‘the young’: the old are narrow-minded, the old are outdated, the old don’t ‘get it’ … There have always been demarcations between generations, some lines of conflict are predictable, others are new. If Karl Mannheim’s generation theory from 1928 is to be believed, then these conflicts are unavoidable. However, the latest sociological studies speak less and less of an irresolvable conflict and more of a conflict-orientated resolvability, whereby a more developed culture of debate and more generational solidarity are a prerequisite. Discursive openness can open up a dialogue space that provides stimuli for both ‘sides’ and at least does not rule out consensus building. In this event, we would like to question, among other things, whether topics such as religion, tradition and home play such a supposedly important role for the older generations, but also whether or why the younger generations seem to succumb to a worship of everything digital – smartphones, social media and streaming providers. What makes people happy and what is their relationship to music and culture if they were born in different decades? These topics of conversation and other (supposedly) contentious issues will be taken up in this event and discussed by you – with the aim of posing the question of generations anew. How do these attributions work and what significance do they have for our own self-image? Where do difficult-to-bridge gaps open up? But also: Can there be intergenerational solidarity? Perhaps generations are more similar than one would have expected?

Learning Outcomes

 

·      Exploring generational values: Students can recognise and reflect on the different values and cultural preferences of different generations (e.g. in relation to religion, tradition, home and digital media).

·      Developing understanding and empathy: Students can learn techniques to understand and empathise with the perspectives and arguments of other generations.

·      Questioning and reflectively practising intergenerational solidarity: Students can develop strategies for practising a constructive culture of debate and reflecting on intergenerational solidarity.

·      Appreciative discussion: Students can improve their discussion skills by actively participating in discussions on intergenerational topics and practising consensus-building. Consensus can also be achieved as knowledge of dissent.

·      Identification of overlaps: Students can identify and analyse similarities and differences between values and priorities with interlocutors.

Program

17.10.2024

Kickoff – Leonardo seminar room

 

Dozent*in
Lehrstuhl/Institution/Organisation

21.11.2024

Topic 1 – BAK

Dozent*in
Lehrstuhl/Institution/Organisation

28.11.2024

Topic 2 – BAK

Dozent*in
Lehrstuhl/Institution/Organisation

19.12.2024

Topic 3 – BAK

Dozent*in
Lehrstuhl/Institution/Organisation

09.01.2025

Topic 4 – BAK

Dozent*in
Lehrstuhl/Institution/Organisation

23.01.2025

Conclusion – Leonardo seminar room

Dozent*in
Lehrstuhl/Institution/Organisation

Possible TOPICS:

Procedure/Working method

Depending on the course of studies, module and examination, credit points can be achieved through participation. If you would like to take an exam, please make sure beforehand how you can get credit for it in your degree program. Of course, you can also take exams without receiving curricular credit for them. Visit our FAQs for more information.

Certificate/Examination CP
certification of participation -
Protokoll 2CP
Scroll to top